13:12 INNOVO<00703> - Results Announcement (2) 3. QUALIFIED AUDITORS' REPORT As explained in note 1, the financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis on the basis that a controlling shareholder has agreed to provide adequate financial support to enable the Group to meet in full its financial obligations as they fall due in the foreseeable future. Although the Company has received a letter of support from the controlling shareholder evidencing the commitment in this respect, we are unable to obtain sufficient evidence to satisfy ourselves as to the financial resources of the controlling shareholder and so as to his ability to provide financial support to the Group. If the financial support from the controlling shareholder is not forthcoming and the Group is unable to obtain sufficient other sources of financing, the Group may cease to operate and the going concern basis would then be inappropriate. In these circumstances, adjustments might be required to reduce the value of assets to their recoverable amount and to provide for any further liabilities might arise. In forming our opinion, we have considered the adequacy of the disclosure included in the balance sheet of the Group at 31st December, 2004 are amounts of HK$29,323,000 and HK$38,682,000 due from a trade debtor and the former director respectively. The Group has filed claims in June 2004 and July 2004 against the trade debtor and the former director respectively in the Hong Kong High Court to recover the amounts. Since the claims are still pending for hearing, the directors consider it is unable to determine the final outcome of the claims at such preliminary stage. Accordingly, no allowance in respect of either of these amounts has been made in the financial statements. We consider this fundamental uncertainty has been adequately disclosed in the financial statements and our opinion is not qualified on this respect. As explained in note 1, a subsidiary (Panyu Fantasy Film City Limited) ("PFFCL"), which is under the control of a local court in Mainland China, was de-consolidated in the financial statements of the Group for the year ended 31st December, 2003. However, this accounting treatment was not in accordance with Statement of Standard Accounting Practice No. 32 "Consolidated financial statements and accounting for investments in subsidiaries" issued by the Hong Kong Institute of Certified Public Accountants because as at 31st December, 2003, in our opinion, the Group retained the ability, by virtue of its equity interest in PFFCL, to exercise effective control. Accordingly, in our opinion, the results, cash flows and changes in equity of PFFCL should have been consolidated throughout the period up to May 2004 and any loss on de-consolidation recognised. In the absence, however, of the financial statements of PFFCL for this period, it is not practicable for us to determine the effect on the financial statements of the failure to properly account for PFFCL. Because of the significance of the limitation in the scope of our work related to the going concern basis, we are unable to form an opinion as to whether the financial statements give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the Company and the Group as at 31st December, 2004 or of the loss and cash flows of the Group for the year then ended and as to whether the financial statements have been properly prepared in accordance with the disclosure requirements of the Hong Kong Companies Ordinance.