08:55 401 HOLDINGS<00401> - Results Announcement (3) In forming their opinion the auditors also evaluated the overall adequacy of the presentation of information in the accounts. The auditors believe that their audit provides a reasonable basis for their opinion. Fundamental uncertainty Trading of the Company's shares has been suspended since 28 March 2003. On 19 May 2004, the Stock Exchange announced that the Company had been placed into the third stage of the de-listing procedure. The Stock Exchange imposed a six-month period to 18 November 2004 for the Company to submit a viable resumption proposal. On 25 October 2004, the Company submitted the Resumption Proposal to the Listing Division of Stock Exchange ("Listing Division"). The Resumption Proposal set out a proposed self-restructuring proposal of the Company, under which, amongst other things, the full amount of the liabilities of the Company will be discharged and compromised through the schemes of arrangement with the creditors and the entire interests of the Company in its dormant or insolvent subsidiaries will be transferred to a nominee of the scheme administrators. However, the Listing Division did not consider the Resumption Proposal represents a viable proposal and has advised that it will apply to the Listing Committee of the Stock Exchange ("Listing Committee") for the cancellation of listing of the Company's shares. The Company has requested a review of the Listing Division's decision by the Listing Committee. This notwithstanding, in light of, inter alia, the petitioning creditor's support for the proposed self-restructuring, the High Court of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region on 10 January 2005 further adjourned the hearing of the petition to wind up the Company to 14 March 2005. Should the listing of the Company's shares be cancelled, the petitioning creditor may proceed with the winding-up petition and the Company may be wound up. In these circumstances, adjustments might have to be made further to reduce the value of properties for sales to their forced sales value. The auditors consider that the fundamental uncertainty has been adequately disclosed in the accounts and their opinion is not qualified in this respect. Qualified opinion: Disclaimer on view given by the accounts Because of the significance of the possible effects of the limitation in evidence available to the auditors referred to in the "Basis of opinion" section, the auditors are unable to form an opinion as to whether the accounts give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the Company and of the Group as at 31 March 2004 and of the Group's loss and cash flows for the year then ended and as to whether the accounts have been properly prepared in accordance with the disclosure requirements of the Hong Kong Companies Ordinance. As set out in the section "Basis of Opinion" : (i) the auditors have not obtained all the information and explanations that they considered necessary for their audit; and (ii) the auditors were unable to determine whether proper books of account had been kept.