confusion

[al chu <alchu@i1.net>]

Dear Dr. Lee:

        I don't know why you accused me confusion of Minzu and nationality
in you last letter.  This is the third time in the row you answer my letter
without posting my letter first (including the one I CC to your mail on
asiawind).  It is not right to answer someone pubicly without let others
know my message in totol first.
        I read my few previous letters carefully. First about the
disagreement between the Prime ministers Lee K.Y. and Li Peng, I merely gave
a story without a comment. If you want to accuse one of them get confused, I
won't argue with you.
        Second, I said many people in Tibet and Sin-Tsiang won't agree with
your definition of Chinese, China and Zhonghua Minzu. I did not discuss
Minzu and nationality.
        Third, I discussed Hakka was not included  in Han by some especially
some Kwantonese. You can find that information in Lo Sian-lin 's book. I did
not make it up nor I discuss the relationship between Minzu and nationality.
        Fourth, I answered your question about Taiwan Min-tsu. I said you
can use  the similar definition you used for Zhonghwa Minzu. 
        Please used evidences before your accusations. Thanks       Jen-yih Chu